Post by account_disabled on Mar 6, 2024 22:42:23 GMT -5
From this perspective, the creators asked Iceta that the fight against piracy be part of Spain's priorities during the presidency of the European Union , a request that was taken up by the Minister of Culture and Sports himself. The creators have conveyed to the minister a series of urgent requests because "we must reverse the situation of serious damage that piracy continues to cause in our country." Firstly, the drastic commitment of all political forces, public administrations and the ministries of Economy, Interior, Justice, Education, Culture and Sports to definitively reinforce the fight against piracy.
Along with this, they demand an “ extraordinary reinforcement of personal and material resources in the administrative channel and also of the specialized units of the State Fax Lists Security Forces and Corps.” And as a third element, a historical claim, the creation of a prosecutor attached to the Computer Crime Chamber prosecutor who can deal with crimes against Intellectual Property in a specialized and coordinated manner. Relative effectiveness of measures They affirm that the measures adopted have had their impact, but the resources allocated are not sufficient and that, today, one in two consumers (55% compared to 52% in 2021) has tried to access a portal with illicit content. that had been closed or had ceased to exist.
Closing/blocking access to a website with illegal content or not allowing access to it remains the coercive measure considered most effective. 80% of Internet users believe this (77% in 2021). For the first time, in 2022, the Observatory asks about the main factors why they would stop consuming free digital content . 7% would abandon these practices if their credit card data could be stolen; 72% if a virus infected their devices. And 65%, in the event that the data they provide to access free content were sold. And up to 36% would do so if jobs in the cultural sector were at risk . Why is there a population that does not access free content portals? Mostly, for fear of fraud with personal data or cybercrimes (71%) and computer viruses (68%).
Along with this, they demand an “ extraordinary reinforcement of personal and material resources in the administrative channel and also of the specialized units of the State Fax Lists Security Forces and Corps.” And as a third element, a historical claim, the creation of a prosecutor attached to the Computer Crime Chamber prosecutor who can deal with crimes against Intellectual Property in a specialized and coordinated manner. Relative effectiveness of measures They affirm that the measures adopted have had their impact, but the resources allocated are not sufficient and that, today, one in two consumers (55% compared to 52% in 2021) has tried to access a portal with illicit content. that had been closed or had ceased to exist.
Closing/blocking access to a website with illegal content or not allowing access to it remains the coercive measure considered most effective. 80% of Internet users believe this (77% in 2021). For the first time, in 2022, the Observatory asks about the main factors why they would stop consuming free digital content . 7% would abandon these practices if their credit card data could be stolen; 72% if a virus infected their devices. And 65%, in the event that the data they provide to access free content were sold. And up to 36% would do so if jobs in the cultural sector were at risk . Why is there a population that does not access free content portals? Mostly, for fear of fraud with personal data or cybercrimes (71%) and computer viruses (68%).
and a lot of information will be out of date.